Christology Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

the Nazareneology - Essay ExampleAlthough all attempts to categorize the views of others risk oversimplification, it is nonetheless necessary to discern between and categorize different approaches if we are to evaluate them briefly and effectively.What does this say about Christian representation I do not mean to suggest that evangelization is incompatible with respectful dialogue -- quite the opposite. Although evangelizing calls at times for clarity about the faith that informs Christian action, evangelizing is not the same thing as proselytizing. To evangelise is to experience to the Gospel, and very often the witness that is required is decency, cooperation in pursuit of the common good, and willingness to profess ones get faith truthfully (Haight, 2000, 103-112). In the context of interfaith dialogue, witness to the Gospel should lie precisely in refusing to take advantage of the situation to make converts. But this is the nub of the problem, since it is precisely the conte nt of the Gospel as it relates to dialogue that is in question. (Sobrino, 2002, 42-48)The refuChristology in Contemporary ChristianityThe refusal to proselytize can all be a witness to the Gospel if the Gospel itself warrants such a refusal. Christians have al substances understood the Good unsandeds as something which demands to be shared with everybody because the salvation it proclaims is addressed to everybody (Hill, 2004, 93-100). If there are times and situations when going out of ones way to make converts is to be avoided for the sake of the Gospel itself, this can only be because the Gospel vision places a high value on respectful dialogue, even on a dialogue that is prepared to extend interminably with no agreement in view. Thinking along these lines, we might say that in Christ the presence of the alien is welcomed and the fact of difference is embraced-this is the Good News that is proclaimed by Christians when they not only live peaceably with nonbelievers but seek fe llowship and common cause with followers of any usance that honors the stranger and says yes to difference. But if significance (or even the mere assumption of religious superiority) is the natural fruit of Christian faith, then the Gospel I have just described cannot be the Christian Gospel. (Snyder, 1988, 54-62)We can too turn this around and say that if philosophical significance does not belong to the essence of Christianity, what we are left hand with is a Christian Gospel that demands that the church forswear all claims to spiritual privilege, and rejoice as it does so. So, where does the Christian Gospel really stand with respect to philosophical significance As I have suggested, the New Testament itself is unable to decide the question, since it can be read both ways. This collection of mid-to-late first-century texts with widely variable and at times contradictory theological agendas is unified by its persistent claim that Jesus is the messiah (Snyder, 1988, 54-62). So me would add that it is also unified by the importance implied in this claim about Jesus.